Aptera Test Drive A Success!

by Justin on December 24, 2007

in Cars,News,Transportation


It’s the Aptera — a futuristic car that has generated a lot of buzz lately — and with good reason — the Aperta is a very, very efficient vehicle (just check out the video: you’ll see what I’m talking about). The car’s head-turning design has a purpose: the shape is highly aerodynamic (much like a jet). It ready available for pre-order, and priced at about $27,000. There will be two models of the Aptera: an all-electric version that goes 120 miles on a charge (for 2008), and a gasoline version that will get 300 mpg (for 2009). The car is also said to be very safe, see the safety FAQ here.

Aptera founder and CEO Steve Fambro says sticking your hand out the window of an average car driving 55 mph creates more drag than the Aptera’s entire body. Recently, Popular Mechanics, took the Aptera for a test drive. Here’s their enthusiastic reaction:

Turn the dial to the “D” position, and the Aptera accelerates like many other pure EVs, with a constant rush of torque. The powertrain pulls strongly up to 50 mph or so (the fastest the streets on our route would allow). Interestingly, when you floor the accelerator, there’s a moment when the rearend jacks up slightly as the torque is applied. It’s a slight feeling, as it is on some shaft-drive motorcycles — and it’s kind of fun. It makes the acceleration feel stronger than it is.

Here’s a video clip of the test drive:

Website: Aptera

Via: Popular Mechanics via Ecotality


Read more! Related stories:

  1. 100% Electric Aptera Unveiled
  2. Intelligent Electrical Outlets: Efficient and Safe

{ 42 comments… read them below or add one }

David December 24, 2007 at 3:46 pm

I must have it. Please tell me they’re selling this right now.

Reply

Nick December 24, 2007 at 4:53 pm

Looks kinda flimsy. What does it have for safety features? That 300 mpg is all well and good but pretty useless if I end up having to get scraped off the bottom of a hummer.

Reply

Nick's Mom December 24, 2007 at 5:41 pm

Shutup Nick go to sleep!

Reply

William Bennett December 24, 2007 at 5:50 pm

The 300mpg value is nonsense since you still have to charge its batteries from your wall socket in addition to the gas. Calculating things this way, a pure electric car gets infinity miles to the gallon.

Reply

John December 24, 2007 at 6:09 pm

This looks really neat! If only I had 27K lying around…

@ Nick: They mention some safety features in the video (specifically about frontal collisions), but I still have some questions about side collisions. I didn’t see any safety features there.

And I know they mention that the car is nice and roomy, but from a practical, average consumer standpoint, there is no (as far as I saw) trunk, which is something of a dealbreaker for a lot of people.

All that said, the green value of this vehicle and the wow factor make it a serious contender for the specialty market it seems to be designed for.

Reply

John's Mom December 24, 2007 at 6:53 pm

Shutup John go to sleep!

Reply

Mr Market December 24, 2007 at 7:19 pm

This has absolutely ZERO chance of being successful.

Reply

Momma Market December 24, 2007 at 8:18 pm

Shutup Dexter, and GO TO SLEEP!!!!

Reply

Dilbert December 24, 2007 at 8:37 pm

“They mention some safety features in the video (specifically about frontal collisions), but I still have some questions about side collisions. I didn’t see any safety features there.”

Play it again John, your question is answered.

Reply

Yo Mama December 24, 2007 at 8:40 pm

Will you boys go to sleep? How do you expect Santa to come when you’re all awake?

Reply

Phil December 24, 2007 at 8:41 pm

Wow!! 27 thousand and you look cooler than anyone else on the road!

I really need to try this out, though I don’t think it will fare well in Canadian winters.

Reply

W December 24, 2007 at 8:45 pm

Dear John,

The side impact door beam and door structure is constructed to be TWICE the required strength of a normal passenger car, even though they don’t have to do it.
Airbags? got ‘em. Roll bar? got it. Cross-car beam? got it. Composite structural frame? got it. Crumple zone? 45 inches up front with an angled “firewall” to provide greater deflection.

Safety first. Energy performance next. Brilliant.

Trunk space? go check the picture of the trunk open and all the crap that fits. Golf bags? 2. Surfboards? 2 up to 7ft. Grocery bags? up to 15!
Big enough trunk for ya?

It will only be sold in California.

Dear Mr. Market: define ZERO.

W

Reply

Looking for Version 4.0 December 24, 2007 at 10:26 pm

Can’t think of a place where I could drive “up to 50mph” and still feel safe. Good concept, but give me 100mpg instead of 300mpg and make it go up to 85mph, please. Until then, it is just another fun electric car that Ed Bagley Jr. can tout on his way to collect St. Elswhere royalty checks. Not much for anyone else.

Reply

jeriatric December 24, 2007 at 10:40 pm

Does the fact that it’s only going to sold in California means the all electric version has a cold weather performance restriction? I didn’t catch any mention of an in-car heater, de-icer for the windows, and flush headlights. Would these be Hybrid only options?

Just because we live ‘up north’ shouldn’t deprive us of a major innovation is driving or relegated to driving only in the summer. Gasoline cost more in the winter.:-)

Reply

jeriatric December 24, 2007 at 11:35 pm

I did catch the part about climate control but I can’t imagine how much an all electric heater would drain the batteries in ‘cold country’.

Will the hybrid version be regenerative?

I looked in vain for the pictures of the trunk space features that W mentioned. :-(

Reply

W December 24, 2007 at 11:41 pm

jeriatric: go to the aptera site and vehicle details.
http://aptera.com/details.php

hit the advance button until the last image. surfboards, beach chairs, etc. big trunk.

W

Reply

Richard December 24, 2007 at 11:43 pm

It looks like a sperm cell.

Reply

Bob December 25, 2007 at 12:12 am

Looking: The car goes up to 90mph. Popular Mechanics only took it up to 50mph in their tests because of speed limits where they were driving.

Reply

Nicks Mom's mom's mom December 25, 2007 at 12:17 am

plz get yo ass to bed

Reply

Matt December 25, 2007 at 12:33 am

Hmm. I’d really love one. I don’t care about looks, that’s why I drive a Scion xB now. This aptera is has many great features, and looks aside, it looks roomy enough for two. If $27K was in my budget, I’d be getting one immediately.

Reply

safety first December 25, 2007 at 2:23 am

its great and all that its designed to withstand twice the standard force of impact… but a car made from diamonds wouldn’t necessarily protect the squishables inside (the organics anyway) if it got hit by a hummer weighing 10x more and going 70 mph. that said, it looks light enough (and prob has to be for fuel eco) that a motorcycle could side-end it and send it tumbling… and crumpled frames aren’t all that aero-d. not to mention the expense of fixing ever minor dent to maintain said aero-d.

Reply

fitz December 25, 2007 at 7:59 am

If a Hummer hits any other vehicle at 70mph,like a motorcycle, Mini Cooper, Geo, Honda Civic, person on a bicycle, 2 people on a tandem bicycle, horse and buggy, skateboarder, the people are pretty much vaporized. If we use a Hummer as the standard for safety does that mean our streets would be totally filled with JERKOFFS driving competing versions of the Hummer. Could the world handle that many complete JERKOFFS on the road at once in cars
that big. I look at Hummers as unsafe to other cars. We shouldn’t have cars on the street like Hummers. They’re fine for driving over people in a war zone but not practical in the US of A. OK frat boys need em and others of their ilk. A lot of thought went into designing the Aptera. The Hummer was designed to run around in the desert dodging bombs.

Reply

J.C. December 25, 2007 at 3:43 pm

Jerkoffs driving Hummers???
– please tell me I’m not the only one laughing?

Reply

limbodog (not limbodog's mom) December 26, 2007 at 12:30 pm

No J.C. You are not. | Fitz, Hummers and other mall monsters are not safe for other vehicles, but that has *never* been a government standard that the automakers have to meet. An SUV driver is twenty times more likely to kill the occupants of the vehicle they hit than is a car driver. (due largely to the height and shape of the front undercarriage which skips over the doors of shorter cars and crushes the occupants) By that token, I should be allowed to mount reactive armor on my Toyota to blow up any vehicle that comes close to me and protect my life.

Reply

TBurg December 26, 2007 at 5:21 pm

Um william, if you look closlely you will notice that the “gas engine” term used loosely. The car is still going to run solely on electric power. The “gas engine” is just simply a generator that will keep the batteries charged (extending the range to over 300 miles).

Reply

Crosius December 28, 2007 at 1:13 pm

If the Aptera can function through a cold Canadian winter, I want one. I wonder how difficult it will be to replace the windshield. (my municipality sands icy roads and most cars go through a windshield every few winters)

It’s got everything I bought my current (economical compact) car for, plus a huge efficiency increase and a vastly improved aesthetic.

Reply

John December 28, 2007 at 9:05 pm

One rear drive wheel? I can’t imagine this vehicle performing well on snow or ice. I don’t think we’ll see any here in Alaska anytime soon.

Reply

Crosius January 1, 2008 at 12:46 pm

I’m cautiously optimistic. A tire isn’t a track, but there is an example of a rear-driven tadpole vehicle that works just fine on ice and snow – the snowmobile.

Reply

martin January 2, 2008 at 6:24 pm

On a dark and wet night with: lights on, wipers on, radio on, heater on- two kids, wife & dog- would I get out of the drive. ?
A very nice design study indeed.
It is recyclable; good job.
Recycle it into a Honda.

Reply

johnb January 5, 2008 at 2:42 pm

I can’t wait for a Canadian model! At least sell the frame, I can winterize it myself.
Electric blanket on the battery to enhance cold weather performance, winter tires, and a move to front wheel hub motors in place of their conventional rear drive.

Reply

johnb January 5, 2008 at 2:48 pm

I didn’t see side airbags. As funny as it sounds, some sort of external expanding airbag might be something to consider when you fly over the car you hit.

I wonder how many minor changes would be required to extend the wheel suspension so one could add a bottom wing, tail, and motor and make it into a airplane? ;-)

Reply

johnb January 5, 2008 at 2:50 pm

Anybody find detailed specifics on the batteries used? as well as the company support on those batteries

Reply

Paulius February 5, 2008 at 5:27 pm

Finally new and stylish, sustainable cars are coming.

Reply

Christine February 18, 2008 at 9:35 pm

This car is simply amazing! This car is really freakin sweet.

In response to those who were questioning the trunk, would it be smart to have a car and not a trunk? Come on now…

I can’t explain it, this car is just brilliant!

Reply

Simon April 4, 2008 at 4:53 am

Hmm, Well it looks ugly, it can only seat two people, it doesn’t seem to have any room for luggage and it doesn’t look as though it would win if it took on a 4×4 in an accident.
Is it the successor to the Powell Motors Homer?

Reply

Omnipotent April 17, 2008 at 8:01 pm

I will buy one of these as soon as it becomes available in Washington State. I can’t justify $4-5 a gallon and only see an industry average of 20mpg in america.

This will be my next car.

Reply

CHRISTOPHER from Philadelphia; Pa. May 22, 2008 at 11:32 pm

I Love this Car and it’s Mileage possibility. Will You be Making one of these cars that’ll Support the 300 Miles Using both options of Fuel and Electricity ?

Reply

CHRISTOPHER from Philadelphia; Pa. May 22, 2008 at 11:35 pm

Wha I Meant is if the Car can hace a Switch within the Car For Us to Select Using the Fuel Option or the Electricity . All Built within the One Car

Reply

Willie June 5, 2010 at 11:35 pm

Kindly restate in correct English: spelling, structure, complete sentences, etc. Thank you.

Reply

shell/fiona June 5, 2008 at 3:54 am

well…..
the out side is grim look like it came from space
but in side it groovey,
chang the style but keep the in side then maybe yuu would get more buyers!!!!!!!!!
chow for now!!!!!

Reply

nwoR-uavReaperHF October 25, 2008 at 8:42 am

Thiscar looks great.loremo has 4 passangers.
Question:can this car drive thousands of miles without brakingdown through the Nevada roads without over heating?ifitneeds repair where to go?
This car is like a gyrocopter motocycle stylish
Ready to take off from the ground! Which would
You all prefer motor wise!?well I’m located in
Irvine this car has my thoughts!I hope this
Car company becomes number one in green cars
OrangeCounty ! best of luck!

Reply

Mike January 4, 2009 at 10:29 am

Pity the prairie dogs, they see one coming, hunker down so one wheel goes either side of them then get squuissshhed by the centre rear. Ouch!

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: