<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM And Segway Unveil Their Electric 2-Seater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html</link>
	<description>The Guide To Highly Efficient Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-101913</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-101913</guid>
		<description>The whole point of capitalism is that bad ideas and bad companies fail--that the facilities, engineers, and tools get reused by someone with more horse sense. (I think that communism really failed because state run monopolies are never allowed to fail no matter how badly they&#039;re run.) I have absolutely no need for a geekmobile like this one, and I think it false advertising to show a woman in the passenger seat on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point of capitalism is that bad ideas and bad companies fail&#8211;that the facilities, engineers, and tools get reused by someone with more horse sense. (I think that communism really failed because state run monopolies are never allowed to fail no matter how badly they&#8217;re run.) I have absolutely no need for a geekmobile like this one, and I think it false advertising to show a woman in the passenger seat on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-92770</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-92770</guid>
		<description>I cant believe how narrow minded you all are!! dont u understand how technology develops! first u start off prototyping a concept then implement it on a limited scale then it evolves into something sophisticated and functional way beyond what you are now seeing here! -jeeze try somthing different for a change guys! segway self balancing technology is awesome and evolving from crawling on 4 legs like a baby!
your stuck in the past- whats around the corner is too fast for you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant believe how narrow minded you all are!! dont u understand how technology develops! first u start off prototyping a concept then implement it on a limited scale then it evolves into something sophisticated and functional way beyond what you are now seeing here! -jeeze try somthing different for a change guys! segway self balancing technology is awesome and evolving from crawling on 4 legs like a baby!<br />
your stuck in the past- whats around the corner is too fast for you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GM And Segway unviel electric two-seater called Puma</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-69487</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GM And Segway unviel electric two-seater called Puma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-69487</guid>
		<description>[...] via [metaefficient] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [metaefficient] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM And Segway Unveil Their 200-MPG 2-Seater &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-65194</link>
		<dc:creator>GM And Segway Unveil Their 200-MPG 2-Seater &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-65194</guid>
		<description>[...] Larry Burns, vice president of research and development for GM, said it would cost about 35 cents to charge the Puma&#8217;s lithium ion battery system — essentially a larger version of the power system for the Segway Personal Transporter. (more…) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Larry Burns, vice president of research and development for GM, said it would cost about 35 cents to charge the Puma&#8217;s lithium ion battery system — essentially a larger version of the power system for the Segway Personal Transporter. (more…) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustavo</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-64724</link>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-64724</guid>
		<description>What is this stupid obsession with Segway and their self balancing vehicle ?

Very clever technology, good for you, but it doesn&#039;t do anything that a simpler ( and cheaper)  four or three wheeled vehicle would do. 
It is as absurd as a self opening ball point pen.  It would still write the same way a conventional pen would.  If  Segway offered some  performance advantage over a simpler vehicle then it might justify its enormous price tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this stupid obsession with Segway and their self balancing vehicle ?</p>
<p>Very clever technology, good for you, but it doesn&#8217;t do anything that a simpler ( and cheaper)  four or three wheeled vehicle would do.<br />
It is as absurd as a self opening ball point pen.  It would still write the same way a conventional pen would.  If  Segway offered some  performance advantage over a simpler vehicle then it might justify its enormous price tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SportsWear</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-64633</link>
		<dc:creator>SportsWear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-64633</guid>
		<description>It is certainly useful and nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly useful and nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrGreenGear</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-64189</link>
		<dc:creator>MrGreenGear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-64189</guid>
		<description>if this is the car of the future, the future is gonna blow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this is the car of the future, the future is gonna blow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japanese</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-62950</link>
		<dc:creator>Japanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-62950</guid>
		<description>Segway + GM = Bankruptcy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Segway + GM = Bankruptcy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-62681</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-62681</guid>
		<description>Did Segway not realize what a flop this type of product is? And now it&#039;s clear that poor investment, forethought and planning is behind GM&#039;s bankruptcy. There&#039;s a reason that the first Segway bombed: it&#039;s bulky, looks dorky, is unecessarily expensive and doesn&#039;t really solve any problems outside of sheer laziness. There&#039;s really no need for this type of product whatsoever. 

You know what&#039;s more efficient? Walking. Biking would also be a good option. Yes, indeed, it may be a bit more effort, but the only fuel you&#039;ll be burning is calories and that&#039;s just positive for everyone. Seeing as how this vehicle doesn&#039;t appear like it will come close to street legal, all it is replacing is healthy forms of transportation and isn&#039;t really offering a viable, efficient model. Let&#039;s not forget that non-lazy people who actually do walk would have to share the sidewalks with these clunky behemoths. I anticipate that this will go nowhere fast and become an even bigger flop than the Segway. And hopefully that will be the last that we&#039;ll hear from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Segway not realize what a flop this type of product is? And now it&#8217;s clear that poor investment, forethought and planning is behind GM&#8217;s bankruptcy. There&#8217;s a reason that the first Segway bombed: it&#8217;s bulky, looks dorky, is unecessarily expensive and doesn&#8217;t really solve any problems outside of sheer laziness. There&#8217;s really no need for this type of product whatsoever. </p>
<p>You know what&#8217;s more efficient? Walking. Biking would also be a good option. Yes, indeed, it may be a bit more effort, but the only fuel you&#8217;ll be burning is calories and that&#8217;s just positive for everyone. Seeing as how this vehicle doesn&#8217;t appear like it will come close to street legal, all it is replacing is healthy forms of transportation and isn&#8217;t really offering a viable, efficient model. Let&#8217;s not forget that non-lazy people who actually do walk would have to share the sidewalks with these clunky behemoths. I anticipate that this will go nowhere fast and become an even bigger flop than the Segway. And hopefully that will be the last that we&#8217;ll hear from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/cars/gm-segway-unveil-200mpg-2seater.html/comment-page-1#comment-62646</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3360#comment-62646</guid>
		<description>I am 100% behind the idea of electric vehicles being mass-produced and being used on a large scale, but I cannot for the life of me understand why GM, a company perilously close to bankruptcy, would chose a vehicle like this to help propel it towards a future.

Besides the incredibly limited range and speed, it looks hideously uncomfortable, dangerous (virtually no side impact protection) and very exposed to the elements both in terms of traction and no windows.  i.e. you can kiss goodbye to using this when there is even a hint of ice or snow around.

I know this is designed as a commuter vehicle, but assuming you go out of town just once every so often, you will have to own an entirely separate vehicle to do so.

Seriously GM, come up with something good-looking, and something which is not so limited to a niche market.  You have gone from huge gas-guzzlers to granny-mobiles...find some midway ground because that&#039;s where the market is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 100% behind the idea of electric vehicles being mass-produced and being used on a large scale, but I cannot for the life of me understand why GM, a company perilously close to bankruptcy, would chose a vehicle like this to help propel it towards a future.</p>
<p>Besides the incredibly limited range and speed, it looks hideously uncomfortable, dangerous (virtually no side impact protection) and very exposed to the elements both in terms of traction and no windows.  i.e. you can kiss goodbye to using this when there is even a hint of ice or snow around.</p>
<p>I know this is designed as a commuter vehicle, but assuming you go out of town just once every so often, you will have to own an entirely separate vehicle to do so.</p>
<p>Seriously GM, come up with something good-looking, and something which is not so limited to a niche market.  You have gone from huge gas-guzzlers to granny-mobiles&#8230;find some midway ground because that&#8217;s where the market is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
