<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=etymotic-er-6-isolator</link>
	<description>The Guide To Highly Efficient Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:48:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Rated Noise Canceling Headphones &#124; Diy all the Way</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html/comment-page-1#comment-85794</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Rated Noise Canceling Headphones &#124; Diy all the Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=50#comment-85794</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Rated Noise Canceling Headphones - Zidee.com</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html/comment-page-1#comment-85787</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Rated Noise Canceling Headphones - Zidee.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=50#comment-85787</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Wireless Earbuds For iPods @ What You Need</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html/comment-page-1#comment-73932</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Wireless Earbuds For iPods @ What You Need</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=50#comment-73932</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Rated Earbuds: The Etymotic ER-6 Isolator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erhan Hosca</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/earbud-headphones/etymotic-er-6-isolator.html/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Erhan Hosca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=50#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I must take exception to this factually incorrect statement

&quot;Bass buffs will be happier with a full-size Grado SR60 ($69), our iPod headphone champs.&quot;

These lowest end Grado&#039;s are known for their flat response and rather &quot;tinny&quot; sound. Their cosmetic appeal far exceeds their sonic abilities, hence preferred mostly by  the tragically image conscious.

If you really want low-end a pair of decent Sennheisers will do a much better job. (plus you won&#039;t look like a WWII telegraph operator waering one)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must take exception to this factually incorrect statement</p>
<p>&#8220;Bass buffs will be happier with a full-size Grado SR60 ($69), our iPod headphone champs.&#8221;</p>
<p>These lowest end Grado&#8217;s are known for their flat response and rather &#8220;tinny&#8221; sound. Their cosmetic appeal far exceeds their sonic abilities, hence preferred mostly by  the tragically image conscious.</p>
<p>If you really want low-end a pair of decent Sennheisers will do a much better job. (plus you won&#8217;t look like a WWII telegraph operator waering one)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
