<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Largest Wind Farm In The World: Horse Hollow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow</link>
	<description>The Guide To Highly Efficient Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:48:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-90038</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-90038</guid>
		<description>you have 291 wind genorators why did you not just make it 300</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have 291 wind genorators why did you not just make it 300</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi J</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-86534</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-86534</guid>
		<description>That is 4 engines per unit, not F engines. Excuse the typo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is 4 engines per unit, not F engines. Excuse the typo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi J</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-86533</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-86533</guid>
		<description>I live near Horse Hollow Wind Farm and yes it has helped our local economy, but I also have to wonder just how cost efficient they really are when over 100 of them are needing the F engines per unit replaced or repaired. That is yes, 400 engines leaking oil inside those massive towers. Electric engines require electricity to run, and I have never heard just how much of the energy produced by each wind turbine is used to run it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live near Horse Hollow Wind Farm and yes it has helped our local economy, but I also have to wonder just how cost efficient they really are when over 100 of them are needing the F engines per unit replaced or repaired. That is yes, 400 engines leaking oil inside those massive towers. Electric engines require electricity to run, and I have never heard just how much of the energy produced by each wind turbine is used to run it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-83281</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-83281</guid>
		<description>as a person who previously worked at the Horse Hollow wind farm (2006-2008) i can tell you that the land is not 73 square miles of &quot;Industrial Park&quot;. It&#039;s farm land. There were cows and crops there far before there were wind turbines. There are still just as many cows and crops there now minus the relatively small footprint of the wind turbines. Most of the wind turbines are directly off the ranchers access roads so not much was put in as far as access roads are concerned. Anyone who has not been on a wind farm has no idea what they&#039;re talking about when they start opening their mouths about wind farms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a person who previously worked at the Horse Hollow wind farm (2006-2008) i can tell you that the land is not 73 square miles of &#8220;Industrial Park&#8221;. It&#8217;s farm land. There were cows and crops there far before there were wind turbines. There are still just as many cows and crops there now minus the relatively small footprint of the wind turbines. Most of the wind turbines are directly off the ranchers access roads so not much was put in as far as access roads are concerned. Anyone who has not been on a wind farm has no idea what they&#8217;re talking about when they start opening their mouths about wind farms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-82172</link>
		<dc:creator>E.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-82172</guid>
		<description>Anonymous wrote: &quot;Your counterpoints: the windmill looks so ugly! Guess what? A coal plant looks f’ing ugly, too. And it belches death into the air. And a coal mine looks even uglier. And it destroys the environment far more than a windmill. &quot;

That same specious argument is used to justify ANWR drilling, with the claim that the total &quot;footprint&quot; is &quot;only 2,000 acres.&quot; It ignores the spiderweb effect of all the land in between, plus all the access roads. It&#039;s like saying you can build a scattered subdivision over a  huge area and still call it wilderness. It just doesn&#039;t work that way.

Horse Hollow covers 47,000 acres, which is 73 square miles, or a rectangle 7.3 miles by 10 miles. Show me another type of plant that remotely comes close to using that amount of land. Again, it&#039;s total coverage per megawatt, not just specific spots where the towers reside. A lot of &quot;green&quot; hypocrites would scream if an oil well farm covered that much area. And oil rigs are destined for removal when the wells go dry. Wind turbines just sit there in permablight status.

Mindlessly chasing wind because of greenhouse gas reductions is a poor quality-of-life trade off. Nuclear and solar (ideally on existing rooftops) makes a lot more economic and aesthetic sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous wrote: &#8220;Your counterpoints: the windmill looks so ugly! Guess what? A coal plant looks f’ing ugly, too. And it belches death into the air. And a coal mine looks even uglier. And it destroys the environment far more than a windmill. &#8221;</p>
<p>That same specious argument is used to justify ANWR drilling, with the claim that the total &#8220;footprint&#8221; is &#8220;only 2,000 acres.&#8221; It ignores the spiderweb effect of all the land in between, plus all the access roads. It&#8217;s like saying you can build a scattered subdivision over a  huge area and still call it wilderness. It just doesn&#8217;t work that way.</p>
<p>Horse Hollow covers 47,000 acres, which is 73 square miles, or a rectangle 7.3 miles by 10 miles. Show me another type of plant that remotely comes close to using that amount of land. Again, it&#8217;s total coverage per megawatt, not just specific spots where the towers reside. A lot of &#8220;green&#8221; hypocrites would scream if an oil well farm covered that much area. And oil rigs are destined for removal when the wells go dry. Wind turbines just sit there in permablight status.</p>
<p>Mindlessly chasing wind because of greenhouse gas reductions is a poor quality-of-life trade off. Nuclear and solar (ideally on existing rooftops) makes a lot more economic and aesthetic sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-82170</link>
		<dc:creator>E.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-82170</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s 47,000 acres (73 square miles!) that used to be relatively scenic and is now an industrial park. Many roads had to be cut into that land to service the towers.

I pity America&#039;s remaining open space that isn&#039;t protected and exists in high-rated wind zones. Wind power has the potential to ruin the old frontier, or the semblance of one that still inspires imaginations. People have to clutter every possible acre with themselves, homes, roads, cattle and chattel. When will it stop?

Those who argue against turbines strictly on economic terms need to get souls. This is the most visually-destructive form of energy per megawatt ever invented. Huge solar arrays aren&#039;t so great either, but they have a much lower profile. We should put all this wind fervor into making nuclear safer, since it has much greater energy density.

Of course, we must never ask people (worldwide) to use more birth control to stabilize population size  and energy demand, thus reducing the need for these &quot;green&quot; scars in the first place. Yeah, let&#039;s avoid common sense and just build, build, build. It &quot;creates jobs&quot; after all; slaves to the mindless mantra of growth. You can often spot bad environmental policy by the increase in construction jobs it creates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s 47,000 acres (73 square miles!) that used to be relatively scenic and is now an industrial park. Many roads had to be cut into that land to service the towers.</p>
<p>I pity America&#8217;s remaining open space that isn&#8217;t protected and exists in high-rated wind zones. Wind power has the potential to ruin the old frontier, or the semblance of one that still inspires imaginations. People have to clutter every possible acre with themselves, homes, roads, cattle and chattel. When will it stop?</p>
<p>Those who argue against turbines strictly on economic terms need to get souls. This is the most visually-destructive form of energy per megawatt ever invented. Huge solar arrays aren&#8217;t so great either, but they have a much lower profile. We should put all this wind fervor into making nuclear safer, since it has much greater energy density.</p>
<p>Of course, we must never ask people (worldwide) to use more birth control to stabilize population size  and energy demand, thus reducing the need for these &#8220;green&#8221; scars in the first place. Yeah, let&#8217;s avoid common sense and just build, build, build. It &#8220;creates jobs&#8221; after all; slaves to the mindless mantra of growth. You can often spot bad environmental policy by the increase in construction jobs it creates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-78272</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-78272</guid>
		<description>The issue at hand when dealing with renewables like solar and wind is that by and large people are very myopic. You look at the financials this year and see a huge investment in something that doesn&#039;t seem to generate a lot of money for the amount of power it produces. But think about over the next twenty years. Americans, especially, are crippled by shortsightedness and the need to have things here and now. In the long run, renewables pay off HUGE. The environment is largely untouched, except for building the actual machinery.

Your counterpoints: the windmill looks so ugly! Guess what? A coal plant looks f&#039;ing ugly, too. And it belches death into the air. And a coal mine looks even uglier. And it destroys the environment far more than a windmill. 

Another counterpoint: what about all those workers at the coal mine who lose their jobs! Other forms of energy (solar, wind, hydro, etc.) all require people to work, also. And these other forms also require a higher level of education. So the incentive is for people to go back to school and learn more. And, on top of that, all those coal workers who are subjected to piss poor working conditions, the burdens of unionized labor, and horrible wages now can live a healthier lifestyle, go back to school, and find better jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue at hand when dealing with renewables like solar and wind is that by and large people are very myopic. You look at the financials this year and see a huge investment in something that doesn&#8217;t seem to generate a lot of money for the amount of power it produces. But think about over the next twenty years. Americans, especially, are crippled by shortsightedness and the need to have things here and now. In the long run, renewables pay off HUGE. The environment is largely untouched, except for building the actual machinery.</p>
<p>Your counterpoints: the windmill looks so ugly! Guess what? A coal plant looks f&#8217;ing ugly, too. And it belches death into the air. And a coal mine looks even uglier. And it destroys the environment far more than a windmill. </p>
<p>Another counterpoint: what about all those workers at the coal mine who lose their jobs! Other forms of energy (solar, wind, hydro, etc.) all require people to work, also. And these other forms also require a higher level of education. So the incentive is for people to go back to school and learn more. And, on top of that, all those coal workers who are subjected to piss poor working conditions, the burdens of unionized labor, and horrible wages now can live a healthier lifestyle, go back to school, and find better jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-76306</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-76306</guid>
		<description>Today I drove from Lubbock Texas down to Abilene Texas.  The amount of wind turbines along highway 84 is staggering.  Some places as far as the eye can see both ways.  The beautiful mesas were covered with them.  Some turning, some not.  Farm land was filled with them with the farm houses being surrounded.  I felt a bit sorry for the folks in those houses and hoped they got a bit of money for their new &#039;crop&#039;.  There is around 78 miles of windmills atleast!  

I guess until they start putting those things all over the city scapes, then the &#039;green&#039; folks with want them.  Never mind all the human &#039;footprints&#039; now all over those beautiful mesas and the wildlife affected.

I wondered how much energy they actually put out.  I looked into getting one for my home (smaller scale) but found out the cost far outweighed any savings in the next 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I drove from Lubbock Texas down to Abilene Texas.  The amount of wind turbines along highway 84 is staggering.  Some places as far as the eye can see both ways.  The beautiful mesas were covered with them.  Some turning, some not.  Farm land was filled with them with the farm houses being surrounded.  I felt a bit sorry for the folks in those houses and hoped they got a bit of money for their new &#8216;crop&#8217;.  There is around 78 miles of windmills atleast!  </p>
<p>I guess until they start putting those things all over the city scapes, then the &#8216;green&#8217; folks with want them.  Never mind all the human &#8216;footprints&#8217; now all over those beautiful mesas and the wildlife affected.</p>
<p>I wondered how much energy they actually put out.  I looked into getting one for my home (smaller scale) but found out the cost far outweighed any savings in the next 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Rawnsley</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-74198</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Rawnsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-74198</guid>
		<description>Investors have devastated hundreds, if not thousands, of acres of pristine desert for windfarms just a few miles south of me (in the Palm Springs, CA area), and more and more are going up all the time. Not only are they ugly and destructive, my power rates are still going up and up. I don&#039;t know who is &quot;making money&quot; or &quot;saving money&quot; on these things, but it sure is not me. Sure, they do not produce CO2, but they guzzle up land like an SUV guzzles up gas. In the name of going &quot;green&quot;, Los Angeles plans to build thousands of these things in the desert along with tearing up hundreds of miles of desert for transmission lines. We won&#039;t see any of that power, either, but we sure will have to look at things and suffer with the destruction they cause to our desert environment. I don&#039;t know what the solution to our energy problems are, but covering our environment with windmills, solar plants, and geothermal installations does not seem all that &quot;environmental&quot;, either. Sure, it&#039;s fine if you live in LA, but then LA doesn&#039;t mind sending their trash and criminals into our desert, either. Anything they don&#039;t want, they just put it here and get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investors have devastated hundreds, if not thousands, of acres of pristine desert for windfarms just a few miles south of me (in the Palm Springs, CA area), and more and more are going up all the time. Not only are they ugly and destructive, my power rates are still going up and up. I don&#8217;t know who is &#8220;making money&#8221; or &#8220;saving money&#8221; on these things, but it sure is not me. Sure, they do not produce CO2, but they guzzle up land like an SUV guzzles up gas. In the name of going &#8220;green&#8221;, Los Angeles plans to build thousands of these things in the desert along with tearing up hundreds of miles of desert for transmission lines. We won&#8217;t see any of that power, either, but we sure will have to look at things and suffer with the destruction they cause to our desert environment. I don&#8217;t know what the solution to our energy problems are, but covering our environment with windmills, solar plants, and geothermal installations does not seem all that &#8220;environmental&#8221;, either. Sure, it&#8217;s fine if you live in LA, but then LA doesn&#8217;t mind sending their trash and criminals into our desert, either. Anything they don&#8217;t want, they just put it here and get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa E</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/renewable-power/the-largest-wind-farm-in-the-world-horse-hollow.html/comment-page-1#comment-73787</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s31669.gridserver.com/?p=834#comment-73787</guid>
		<description>One should always try to be open minded and research each issue before commenting.  I am for alternative power sources and I agree with some of the positive issues on wind power.  But as I research the wind turbines I find that there are many issues that people seem to over look.   It takes tons of fossil fuel elements to produce each wind turbine.  They are not made from recyled products.  Each unit is manufactured from new material.  As we inspect our wind sites we see hundreds of miles of new roads being carved into each area they are placed.  We see hundreds of miles of electrical cable being buried, this cable was produced in a fossil fuel plant.  We observed hundreds of fossil fuel burning cement trucks haul thousands of cubic yards of concrete to pour around miles of steel rebar both made in mfg. plants.  It takes hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel to ship, construct the site and erect these units.  The unit cost of each turbine is in the single digit millions of dollars plus the base, plus the roads, plus the cables plus man power equals a very expensive source of power.  Kw cost factors in the Pacific Northwest for electrical cooperatives two years ago was in the vacinity of: hydro = 3-5 cents per Kw, methane landfill powered = 12 - 18 cents per Kw, wind turbines = 23 - 27 cents per Kw. Another issue is the electrical grid that is having to be constructed to handle all of the different wind turbine locations.  This has a positive aspect as our current electrical grid system is very out dated.
 
The government is involved thus they are telling the power companies what source of power to buy and what % to buy.  This is from a government that does not recognize hydro power as a renewable power source.  Also remember that our taxes are subsidizing each wind turbine or these units would not be expanding as rapidly as they are.  Another concern is the repair bills in the future. 
 
As I drive through our large wind farms in the surrounding areas of the Columbia Gorge and near Walla Walla, Wa there have been times when none of  the units were moving, no wind.  When the wind does not cooperate there is no power created.  

Are these units a good thing?  They create good jobs in every aspects of their creation and operation so my comment is &quot;The future will be the telling process&quot;.  One last item, you will see an increase in your power bill when the taxpayer subsidies dries up.  This is reality of government and big business. Have a blessed day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One should always try to be open minded and research each issue before commenting.  I am for alternative power sources and I agree with some of the positive issues on wind power.  But as I research the wind turbines I find that there are many issues that people seem to over look.   It takes tons of fossil fuel elements to produce each wind turbine.  They are not made from recyled products.  Each unit is manufactured from new material.  As we inspect our wind sites we see hundreds of miles of new roads being carved into each area they are placed.  We see hundreds of miles of electrical cable being buried, this cable was produced in a fossil fuel plant.  We observed hundreds of fossil fuel burning cement trucks haul thousands of cubic yards of concrete to pour around miles of steel rebar both made in mfg. plants.  It takes hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel to ship, construct the site and erect these units.  The unit cost of each turbine is in the single digit millions of dollars plus the base, plus the roads, plus the cables plus man power equals a very expensive source of power.  Kw cost factors in the Pacific Northwest for electrical cooperatives two years ago was in the vacinity of: hydro = 3-5 cents per Kw, methane landfill powered = 12 &#8211; 18 cents per Kw, wind turbines = 23 &#8211; 27 cents per Kw. Another issue is the electrical grid that is having to be constructed to handle all of the different wind turbine locations.  This has a positive aspect as our current electrical grid system is very out dated.</p>
<p>The government is involved thus they are telling the power companies what source of power to buy and what % to buy.  This is from a government that does not recognize hydro power as a renewable power source.  Also remember that our taxes are subsidizing each wind turbine or these units would not be expanding as rapidly as they are.  Another concern is the repair bills in the future. </p>
<p>As I drive through our large wind farms in the surrounding areas of the Columbia Gorge and near Walla Walla, Wa there have been times when none of  the units were moving, no wind.  When the wind does not cooperate there is no power created.  </p>
<p>Are these units a good thing?  They create good jobs in every aspects of their creation and operation so my comment is &#8220;The future will be the telling process&#8221;.  One last item, you will see an increase in your power bill when the taxpayer subsidies dries up.  This is reality of government and big business. Have a blessed day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
