Power Consumption: 58W(power-on) 2W (standby)
Home Page: Samsung
Purchase from:Amazon ($558)
Notes:
The LTN1765 model also incorporates dual component video inputs for a digital set-top box and DVD player. Dual purpose use allows for the easy connection of a PC so you can view PC and TV images simultaneously.
| S-Video | 1 |
| Component Video | 1(Y,Pb,Pr)480i |
| Component Video | 2(Y,Pb,Pr)480p/1080i/720p |
| PC Audio | 1 Rear |
| PC (RGB) Input | 15 Pin D-Sub |
| Headphone Jack |
1 response so far ↓
1 Seth // May 18, 2005 at 8:42 pm
The power consumption comparison for different displays may not be what is generally assumed.
This is excerpted from my blog which has links to the specific models and more info.
I finally found energy consumption stats at B&H.
I still have no other info about other environmental concerns that might help compare the different technologies (eg manufacturing processes, durability). But my basic finding for a sampling of comparable sizes was very surprising: CRT (Sony 36 inch 240 watts), LCD (Sharp 36inch 224watt), Plasma (Sony 37 inch 350Watts). (I would choose a smaller size but plasma screens seems to start at 37 inches.
The popular suggestion that LCD is multiple times lower than CRT (metaefficient suggestion, Viewsonic, etc ) may need to be reexamined. The indication that LCD and Plasma are roughly equivalent may not be right.
It is hard to compare a projector since it doesn’t have a fixed size but the one I am looking at the Epson Powerlite S1 (1400 ANSI lumens) is 200 Lumens and should project over a much larger area.
Before finishing I decided to check if this discrepancy was due to the larger sizes of the TVs I was looking at. There a differences here but nowhere near what is stated in articles 14 inch CRT 60 watts , 14 inch LCD 40 watts).
*
Leave a Comment