<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boeing 787: The World’s Most Efficient Airliner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metaefficient.com/transportation/boeing-787-worlds-efficient-airliner.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/transportation/boeing-787-worlds-efficient-airliner.html</link>
	<description>The Guide To Highly Efficient Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: pete ess</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/transportation/boeing-787-worlds-efficient-airliner.html/comment-page-1#comment-67899</link>
		<dc:creator>pete ess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3424#comment-67899</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin
Was this independently reviewed and rated? When I read: 
&quot;But Boeing&#039;s newest passenger jet, the 787 Dreamliner, - &quot;aims to&quot; - take a big efficiency step forward&quot;, I wonder if this is marketing or fact?
Please verify
Thanks
PS: The opposition states (natch!) &quot;The A350-800, the most eco-efficient next generation aircraft . . &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin<br />
Was this independently reviewed and rated? When I read:<br />
&#8220;But Boeing&#8217;s newest passenger jet, the 787 Dreamliner, &#8211; &#8220;aims to&#8221; &#8211; take a big efficiency step forward&#8221;, I wonder if this is marketing or fact?<br />
Please verify<br />
Thanks<br />
PS: The opposition states (natch!) &#8220;The A350-800, the most eco-efficient next generation aircraft . . &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/transportation/boeing-787-worlds-efficient-airliner.html/comment-page-1#comment-64498</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3424#comment-64498</guid>
		<description>Presumably a lighter aircraft means less power to get it off the ground, so hopefully this plane is much quieter as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably a lighter aircraft means less power to get it off the ground, so hopefully this plane is much quieter as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon @ Luxury Travel Company</title>
		<link>http://www.metaefficient.com/transportation/boeing-787-worlds-efficient-airliner.html/comment-page-1#comment-64175</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon @ Luxury Travel Company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metaefficient.com/?p=3424#comment-64175</guid>
		<description>It seems that maximizing the aerodynamic of the 787 also enhanced its aesthetics. The pointed cone shape of the jet engine&#039;s fan really looks good. I hope they can continue redesigning the 787 and perhaps make it look as good as the Concorde.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that maximizing the aerodynamic of the 787 also enhanced its aesthetics. The pointed cone shape of the jet engine&#8217;s fan really looks good. I hope they can continue redesigning the 787 and perhaps make it look as good as the Concorde.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
